Digest of Certain Supreme Court Decisions Pertinent to the Proposed Western Water Rights Settlement Act (S. 863) and State-Federal Water ProblemsU.S. Government Printing Office, 1958 - 34 strani |
Iz vsebine knjige
Zadetki 1–5 od 7
Stran
... jurisdiction : 3. U. S. v . Rio Grande Irrigation Company , 174 U. S. 690 ( 1899 ) -- 1. Knickerbocker Ice Co. v . Stewart , 253 U. S. 149 ( 1920 ) . 2. State of Washington v . Dawson & Co. , 264 U. S. 219 ( 1924 ) – 25 E. Claims of the ...
... jurisdiction : 3. U. S. v . Rio Grande Irrigation Company , 174 U. S. 690 ( 1899 ) -- 1. Knickerbocker Ice Co. v . Stewart , 253 U. S. 149 ( 1920 ) . 2. State of Washington v . Dawson & Co. , 264 U. S. 219 ( 1924 ) – 25 E. Claims of the ...
Stran 11
... jurisdictions in licensing waterpower projects under the Federal Power Act ** ( p . 156 ) . * In the Federal Power Act there is a separation of those subjects which remain under the jurisdiction of the States from those subjects which ...
... jurisdictions in licensing waterpower projects under the Federal Power Act ** ( p . 156 ) . * In the Federal Power Act there is a separation of those subjects which remain under the jurisdiction of the States from those subjects which ...
Stran 12
... jurisdictions in licensing waterpower projects under the Federal Power Act *** ° Here *** the Commission has issued ... jurisdiction turns upon the ownership or control by the United States of the reserved lands * * * . The authority to ...
... jurisdictions in licensing waterpower projects under the Federal Power Act *** ° Here *** the Commission has issued ... jurisdiction turns upon the ownership or control by the United States of the reserved lands * * * . The authority to ...
Stran 23
... jurisdiction . Whatever may have been the rights acquired under earlier laws with respect to use of waters from the Rio Grande , this 1890 act was held to have effec- tively prohibited a State from interfering with the navigability of ...
... jurisdiction . Whatever may have been the rights acquired under earlier laws with respect to use of waters from the Rio Grande , this 1890 act was held to have effec- tively prohibited a State from interfering with the navigability of ...
Stran 24
... jurisdiction of such reservation , and the privilege herein granted shall not be construed to interfere with the control of water for irrigation and other purposes under authority of the respective States or Territories . " Obviously by ...
... jurisdiction of such reservation , and the privilege herein granted shall not be construed to interfere with the control of water for irrigation and other purposes under authority of the respective States or Territories . " Obviously by ...
Druge izdaje - Prikaži vse
Pogosti izrazi in povedi
act of Congress action actual appropriation affirmed amended applicable appropriation of water Assimilative Crimes Act authority beneficial purposes canal Central Valley project Chandler-Dunbar commerce clause Commodore Park common-law rule compensation conformity congressional constitutional power construction construed decision declared delegate Deschutes River Desert Land Act ditches diversion effect enacted exclusive legislation exercise existing rights Federal Power Act Federal Power Commission flow Friant Dam grant interests Interior interstate commerce Iowa irrigation issued jurisdiction Justice landowners legislative power license limitation McCarran Act ment mining nature navigable streams navigation servitude North Platte project obstruction Oregon ownership permit pilots police power power of Congress power to regulate prior prohibition property right public domain public lands question Reclamation Act recognized regulate commerce require respect riparian rights river Secretary Stat statutes subject to existing supra Supreme Court held tion unappropriated water United valid vested rights water rights became waterpower Wyoming