Regulating Religion: The Courts and the Free Exercise ClauseOxford University Press, 29. mar. 2001 - 288 strani Jurisprudence regarding the "free exercise of religion" clause of the U.S. Constitution is in a state of confusion. There has been a series of rapid changes in the standard used by the Supreme Court to determine when a statute impermissibly restricts free exercise. The trend is now towards greater acceptance of government claims about the importance of regulation over religious practices. Here, Cookson challenges the wisdom of this judicial drift, and its false dichotomy between anarchy and a system that respects religious freedom. In its place she offers a new, practical approach to resolving free exercise conflicts that could be used in both federal and state courts. Cookson shows the reader how violations of religious freedom affect the community whose values are at stake. |
Iz vsebine knjige
Zadetki 1–5 od 79
Stran ix
... conscience would rule, or the government bureaucracy must be left alone to regulate as it deems necessary for (what Justice Scalia assumed to be) society's best interests. There could be no middle course, because judges would then be ...
... conscience would rule, or the government bureaucracy must be left alone to regulate as it deems necessary for (what Justice Scalia assumed to be) society's best interests. There could be no middle course, because judges would then be ...
Stran xi
... Conscience and the State 48 4 The Religiously Encumbered Self 99 5 Societal Boundaries, Paranoia and Ill Humor, and the Role of the Courts under the Free Exercise Clause 109 6 A Critique of the Court's Free Exercise Clause Jurisprudence ...
... Conscience and the State 48 4 The Religiously Encumbered Self 99 5 Societal Boundaries, Paranoia and Ill Humor, and the Role of the Courts under the Free Exercise Clause 109 6 A Critique of the Court's Free Exercise Clause Jurisprudence ...
Stran 17
... conscience as a basic, founding principle of our society, the Court found that this wilderness was also familiar territory: Our outermost boundaries were intended to include vital differences "as to things that touch the heart of the ...
... conscience as a basic, founding principle of our society, the Court found that this wilderness was also familiar territory: Our outermost boundaries were intended to include vital differences "as to things that touch the heart of the ...
Stran 19
... conscience and the obligation to one's God as a practical impediment to the ultimate success of governmental efforts to achieve a coercive unity at the expense of such duties. Martyrs, not converts, are the result. The key lesson of the ...
... conscience and the obligation to one's God as a practical impediment to the ultimate success of governmental efforts to achieve a coercive unity at the expense of such duties. Martyrs, not converts, are the result. The key lesson of the ...
Stran 27
Dosegli ste zgornjo mejo števila strani te knjige, ki je na voljo.
Dosegli ste zgornjo mejo števila strani te knjige, ki je na voljo.
Vsebina
3 | |
6 | |
2 The Process of Casuistry | 39 |
Typologies of the Relationship between Conscience and the State | 48 |
4 The Religiously Encumbered Self | 99 |
5 Societal Boundaries Paranoia and Ill Humor and the Role of the Courts under the Free Exercise Clause | 109 |
6 A Critique of the Courts Free Exercise Clause Jurisprudence in the US Supreme Court Case of Employment Division | 118 |
7 Governmental Intervention in and Punishment for the Use of Spiritual Healing Methods | 149 |
A Summary and Some Conclusions | 186 |
Notes | 189 |
Index | 267 |
Druge izdaje - Prikaži vse
Regulating Religion: The Courts and the Free Exercise Clause Catharine Cookson Omejen predogled - 2001 |
Regulating Religion: The Courts and the Free Exercise Clause Catharine Cookson Omejen predogled - 2001 |
Pogosti izrazi in povedi
abuse according action activity American applied argued arguments authority Backus behavior beliefs benefits boundaries called cause chapter child Christian Christian Science Church civil claims clause common compelling concern conscience considered Constitution context criminal danger decision determine dissenting drug duty emphasis establishment evidence example exemption fact faith favor force framework free exercise harm healing human importance individual interest issue John judge Justice kingdoms legislative liberty limited majority matter means moral nature noted obligations one’s opinion Oregon paradigm parents particular peace person peyote political practice present Press presumption principles problem prohibition protection punishment question reason regulation reli religion religious freedom respect result Reynolds rule simply situation Smith society spiritual state’s statute Supreme Court things tion tolerance unemployment values Witnesses worship writes York