 | 1885 - 1232 strani
...That is not the mode in which this court is accustomed or willing to consider such questions. It has no jurisdiction to pronounce any statute, either of...because irreconcilable with the constitution, except as it is called upon to adjudge the legal rights of litigants in actual controversies. In the exercise... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1885 - 848 strani
...That is not the mode in which this court is accustomed or willing to consider such questions. It has no jurisdiction to pronounce any statute, either of...because irreconcilable with the Constitution, except as it is called upon to adjudge the legal rights of litigants in actual controversies. In the exercise... | |
 | 1903 - 460 strani
...over or inter- AND ference with the President or Congress or the HEARD Legislatures of the States. They have no jurisdiction to pronounce any statute, either of a State or the United States, void because irreconcilable with the Constitution, except as they are called upon... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. District of Columbia - 1925 - 696 strani
...since its inception. Steamship Company v . Emigration Commissioners, 113 TJ. S. 33, at p. 39 : " It has no jurisdiction to pronounce any statute, either of...because irreconcilable with the Constitution, except as It is called upon to adjudge the legal rights of litigants in actual controversies. In the exercise... | |
 | District of Columbia. Rent Commission - 1925 - 108 strani
...adhered since its inception. Steamship Company v. Emigration Commissioners. 113 US 33. at p. 39: "It has no jurisdiction to pronounce any statute, either of...because irreconcilable with the Constitution, except as it is called upon to adjudge the legal rights of litigants in actual controversies. In the exercise... | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the District of Columbia - 1925 - 686 strani
...since its inception. Steamship Company v. Emigration Connnlsstoners, 113 US 33, at p. 39 : " It has no Jurisdiction to pronounce any statute, either of...because irreconcilable with the Constitution, except as it is called upon to adjudge the legal rights of litigants in actual controversies. In the exercise... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1926 - 324 strani
...That is not the mode in which this court is accustomed or willing to consider such questions. It has no jurisdiction to pronounce any statute. either of...because irreconcilable with the Constitution, except as it is called upon to adjudge the legal rights of litigants in actual controversies. In the exercise... | |
 | United States. Customs Court - 1979 - 334 strani
...Marbury y. Madison, 1 Cranch 137, 177180. This Court, as is the case with all Federal courts, "has no jurisdiction to pronounce any statute, either of...because irreconcilable with the Constitution, except as it is called upon to adjudge the legal rights of litigants in actual controversies. In the exercise... | |
 | United States. Congress. House. Committee on Interstate and Foreign Commerce - 1960 - 106 strani
...(Marbury v. Madison, 1 Cranch 137, 177-180). This Court, as is the case with all Federal courts, 'has no jurisdiction to pronounce any statute, either of...because irreconcilable with the Constitution, except as it is called upon to adjudge the legal rights of litigants in actual controversies. In the exercise... | |
 | United States. Congress. House. Committee on Interstate and Foreign Commerce - 1960 - 98 strani
...(Marbury v. Madison, 1 Cranch 137, 177-180). This Court, as is the case with all Federal courts, 'has no jurisdiction to pronounce any statute, either of...because irreconcilable with the Constitution, except as it is called upon to adjudge the legal rights of litigants in actual controversies. In the exercise... | |
| |
It has no jurisdiction to pronounce any statute, either of a state or of the United States, void, because irreconcilable with the constitution, except as it is called upon to adjudge the legal rights of litigants in actual controversies. In the exercise... 
