| United States. Supreme Court - 1949 - 974 strani
...function of free speech under our system of government is to invite dispute. It may indeed best serve its high purpose when it induces a condition of unrest,...conditions as they are, or even stirs people to anger. Speech is often provocative and challenging. It may strike at prejudices and preconceptions and have... | |
| United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary - 1949 - 262 strani
...function of free speech under our system of government is to invite dispute. It may indeed best serve its high purpose when it induces a condition of unrest,...creates dissatisfaction with conditions as they are, or inspires people to anger. Continuing further down: There is no room under our Constitution for a more... | |
| United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary - 1949 - 306 strani
...function of free speech under our system of government is to invite dispute. It may indeed best serve its high purpose when it induces a condition of unrest,...creates dissatisfaction with conditions as they are, or inspires people to anger. Continuing further down: There is no room under our Constitution for a more... | |
| United States. Congress. House. Committee on Un-American Activities - 1950 - 266 strani
...function of free speech under our system of government is to invite dispute. It may indeed best serve its high purpose when it induces a condition of unrest,...with conditions as they are, or even stirs people to anser." We are not alone in voicing our fears of this section. Senator Estes Kefauver has stated :... | |
| United States. Congress. House. Committee on Un-American Activities - 1950 - 274 strani
...function of free spaech under our system of government is to invite dispute. It may indeed best serve its high purpose when it induces a condition of unrest,...dissatisfaction with conditions as they are, or even §tirs people to anger. Speech is often provocative and challenging. It may strike at prejudices and... | |
| United States. Congress. Senate. Special Committee on Aging - 1964 - 1342 strani
...'J'cnninncllo v. the United fitates, in volume :'j3~ of the US Reitorts at page 1. This is a decision of the Supreme Court of the United States explaining...are, or even stirs people to anger." JAMA EDITORIALS QUACKERY QUAKES "Whoever invites public discussion on a public question shouldn't be disappointed if... | |
| |