 | United States. Supreme Court - 1912 - 840 strani
...Justice Harlan, speaking for this court in Southern Pacific R. Co. v. United States, 168 US 1,48: "That a right, question or fact distinctly put in issue...directly determined by a court of competent jurisdiction, as a ground of recovery, cannot be disputed in a subsequent suit between the same parties or their... | |
 | United States. Court of Claims - 1939 - 836 strani
...States, supra, this Court (at pp. 48-49) said: The general principle announced in numerous cases is that a right, question, or fact distinctly put in issue...directly determined by a court of competent jurisdiction, as a ground of recovery, cannot be disputed in a subsequent suit between the same parties or their... | |
 | United States. Court of Claims, Audrey Bernhardt - 1952 - 1040 strani
...put in issue and directly determined by a court of competent jurisdiction, as a ground of recovery, cannot be disputed in a subsequent suit between the same parties or their privies; and even if the second suit is for a different cause of action, the right, question or fact once so... | |
 | United States. Patent Office - 1964 - 972 strani
...put in issue and directly determined by a court of competent jurisdiction, as a ground of recovery, cannot be disputed in a subsequent suit between the same parties or their privies; and even if the second suit Is for a different cause of action, the right, question or fact once so... | |
 | 1920 - 496 strani
...Lindsay-Strathmore Irr. Dlst. v. Superior Court of Tulare County, Cal., 187 Pac. 1056. 54. Res Judicata. — A fact distinctly put In issue and directly determined by a court of competent jurisdiction as a ground of recovery cannot be disputed in a subsequent suit between the same parties, even if the... | |
 | Utah. Supreme Court, Albert Hagan, John Augustine Marshall, John Maxcy Zane, James A. Williams, Joseph M. Tanner, George L. Nye, John Walcott Thompson, August B. Edler, Alonzo Blair Irvine, Harmel L. Pratt, William S. Dalton, H. Arnold Rich - 1912 - 666 strani
...331 ; Waite on Engineering and Architectural Jurisprudence, p. 281 ; Brown v. Foster, 113 Mass. 136.) A right, question, or fact distinctly put in issue...directly determined by a court of competent jurisdiction, as a ground of recovery, cannot be disputed in a subsequent suit between the same parties or their... | |
 | 1917 - 2042 strani
...to which the adjudications in both extend, rrom this has arisen the rule of the Supreme Court that: "A right, question or fact, distinctly put In issue...directly determined by a court of competent jurisdiction, as a ground of recovery, cannot tie disputed in a subsequent suit between the same parties or their... | |
 | 1899 - 986 strani
...HES JuniCATA— CoxcLusivEXEas OF PRIOR ADJUDICATION — Pi. HADING — UAII.KOAD LASI> GKAXTS. 1. A right, question, or fact distinctly put in issue,...directly determined by a court of competent jurisdiction, as a ground of recovery, cannot be disputed in a subsequent suit between the same parties or their... | |
 | 1901 - 958 strani
...355, 371), 18 Sup. Ct. Hep. 18, 27, we said, after an extended examination of the adjudged cases, that "a right, question, or fact distinctly put in issue...directly determined by a court of competent jurisdiction, as a ground of recovery, cannot be disputed in a subsequent suit between the same parties or their... | |
 | 1902 - 988 strani
...48, L. ed. p. 376, Sup. Ct. Rep. p. 27: "The general principle announced in numerous cases is that 83 as a ground of recovery, cannot be disputed in a subsequent suit between the same parties or their... | |
| |
The general principle announced in numerous cases is that a right, question or fact distinctly put in issue and directly determined by a court of competent jurisdiction, as a ground of recovery, cannot be disputed in a subsequent suit between the same... 
