...reasons applying to count No. 2 apply also to this one. and the question of liability under the contract was one of fact for the jury, and not of law for the court. As to count No. 4. This raises a different question than that in counts 2, 3, 5 and 6. It is a claim...

...ratification of the acts of Edwards fy Stewart. Whether Donnell did, or did not consent to them was a question of fact for the jury, and not of law, for the court. And if he did acquiesce in them after notice, and the jury had so found, then in point of law it ratified...

...C, and the prosecutor in evidence stated that his name was Trius C, — Held, that it was a question of fact for the jury, and not of law for the Court, whether the two words were idem son an ti a. The following is the substance of a CASE stated by the...

...them. Others make small and comparatively unimportant words too prominent ; thus , " This is a question of fact for the jury, and not of law for the court, and if the court resume the responsibility of deciding this question, which belongs to the jury and...

...them. Others make small and comparatively unimportant words too prominent; thus, " This is a question of fact for the jury, and not of law for the court, and if the court assume the responsibility o/"deciding this question, which belongs to the jury and...

...and tbc prosecutor in evidence stated that his name was Trios C. : — Jleld, that it was a question of fact for the jury, and not of law for the court, whether the tiro words were idem sonantia. THE following is the substance of a case stated by the Court...

...question whether the plaintiff was justified in assuming that the car had stopped for her to alight was one of fact for the jury, and not of law for the court. This presents the sole question for determination. The ordinance requires that cars shall be stopped...

...the defendant tended to show excessive drinking, which, if true, vitiated the policy. The question was one of fact for the jury, and not of law for the judge. 5. Errors are assigned upon the charge of the court. The sole issue in this case for the determination...

...in the line of official duty. (2.) Whether paid into the Treasury of the State or not was a question of fact for the jury, and not of law for the Court ; and the Court erred in regarding it as a question of law alone, and charging upon it as such. 6....

...depended upon the sense in which it was made by one party, and understood by the other, and was a question of fact for the jury, and not of law for the court. This latter branch of the rule, however, only applies when the contract is verbal, for when it is reduced...