A Clearing in the Forest: Law, Life, and Mind
University of Chicago Press, 2003 - 446 strani
Cognitive science is transforming our understanding of the mind. New discoveries are changing how we comprehend not just language, but thought itself. Yet, surprisingly little of the new learning has penetrated discussions and analysis of the most important social institution affecting our lives-the law.
Drawing on work in philosophy, psychology, anthropology, linguistics, and literary theory, Steven L. Winter has created nothing less than a tour de force of interdisciplinary analysis. A Clearing in the Forest rests on the simple notion that the better we understand the workings of the mind, the better we will understand all its products-especially law. Legal studies today focus on analytic skills and grand normative theories. But, to understand how real-world, legal actors reason and decide, we need a different set of tools. Cognitive science provides those tools, opening a window on the imaginative, yet orderly mental processes that animate thinking and decisionmaking among lawyers, judges, and lay persons alike. Recent findings about how humans actually categorize and reason make it possible to explain legal reasoning in new, more cogent, more productive ways.
A Clearing in the Forest is a compelling meditation on both how the law works and what it all means. In uncovering the irrepressibly imaginative, creative quality of human reason, Winter shows how what we are learning about the mind changes not only our understanding of law, but ultimately of ourselves. He charts a unique course to understanding the world we inhabit, showing us the way to the clearing in the forest.
Mnenja - Napišite recenzijo
Na običajnih mestih nismo našli nobenih recenzij.
1 A Clearing in the Forest
3 What Is Metaphor?
4 Radial Categories
5 Compositional Structure
6 The Doctrinal Wheel
7 What Is the Color of Law?
8 How Do Rules Work?
Druge izdaje - Prikaži vse
action activity actually Amendment analogy appears argued argument authority central chapter characterized claim cognitive color common complex concept Consider consists constitutional constraint context contingent conventional Court cultural decision decisionmaking determine discussion distinction doctrine domain example expectations experience explains expressions extensions fact follow function given grounded hand human ideas imaginative important interpretation judges kind knowledge language linguistic literal logic mapping matter meaning metaphor mind mother motivated narrative nature normative objects observes operate park particular patterns person political possible practices precisely present principle problem properties prototype prototype effects provides question rationalist rationality reason references reflect relations relative represent rule sense similarity situation social speech standard statute story structure supra note theory things thought tion true truth understanding understood values