Hearings, Reports and Prints of the Senate Committee on the JudiciaryU.S. Government Printing Office, 1956 |
Druge izdaje - Prikaži vse
Pogosti izrazi in povedi
action antitrust backlog believe benefit Bennett Board of Appeals CAPLAN cathode-ray tube chairman claims classification Commissioner Watson committee Congress corporations court of appeals decisions delay disclosure district court DUMONT examining corps experience fact Federico field filed gadget give Government grant held invalid idea improvement increase independent inventor individual inventor industry interferences investment casting involved Judge Arnold Judge HAND JUNGERSEN litigation manufacturer matter monopoly number of patents operation Patent Appeals patent applications patent attorney patent examiners patent law patent lawyer Patent Office patent system patentable subject matter patents issued pending percent period practice present prior art problem production protection question result section 103 Senator O'MAHONEY staff standard of invention statement statute suggestion Supreme Court technical thing THURMAN ARNOLD tion trademark Trademark Examining United States Code United States patent valid and infringed
Priljubljeni odlomki
Stran 52 - A patent may not be obtained though the invention is not identically disclosed or described as set forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the subject matter sought to be patented and the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious at the time the invention was made to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which said subject matter pertains ....-: The test for obviousness was set forth by the United States Supreme Court in Graham v.
Stran 276 - An element in a claim for a combination may be expressed as a means or step for performing a specified function without the recital of structure, material, or acts in support thereof...
Stran 253 - ... in determining the question of infringement, the court or jury, as the case may be, are not to judge about similarities or differences by the names of things, but are to look at the machines or their several devices or elements in the light of what they do, or what office or function they perform, and how they perform it, and to find that one thing is substantially the same as another, if it performs substantially the same function hi substantially the same way to obtain the same result...
Stran 253 - ... in determining the question of infringement the court or jury, as the case may be, are not to judge about similarities or differences by the names of things, but are to look at the machines or their several devices or elements in the light of what they do, or what office or function they perform and how they perform it, and to find that one thing is substantially the same as another if it performs substantially the same function in substantially the same way to obtain the same result, always...
Stran 303 - Court for striking them down so that the only patent that is valid is one which this Court has not been able to get its hands on.
Stran 207 - Whenever the Commissioner considers it necessary to maintain the work of the Board of Appeals current, he may designate any patent examiner of the primary examiner grade or higher, having the requisite ability, to serve as examiner-in-chief for periods not exceeding six months each. An examiner so designated shall be qualified to act as a member of the Board of Appeals. Not more than one such primary examiner shall be a member of the Board of Appeals hearing an appeal.
Stran 151 - To provide means for the advancement and extension of technical and scientific investigation, research, and experimentation by contributing the net earnings of the corporation, over and above such sum or sums as may be reserved or retained and held as an endowment fund or working capital...
Stran 53 - A new invention within the domain of industrial art is created whenever there Is established a new functional relationship between any of the factors which are required for rendering such invention practically operative; or in other words, whenever any of the constituent factors of an invention belonging to an industrial art, are functionally related to each other in a novel mode.
Stran 253 - Farrar patent. Did this accomplish a new and valuable result it is quite possible that a patent therefor might have been sustained, but we do not find this to be the case. The cylindrical guide performs the same functions as in the prior patents ; the trough, in which the connecting rod works in the Farrar patent, is practically the same as in the Wright patent, and the combination is a mere aggregation of their respective functions.
Stran viii - State and the city and were issued for the benefit of the public and not for the benefit of the...