Free Speech on CampusRowman & Littlefield, 2000 - 118 strani If the university had a constitution, would it contain a free speech provision as the U.S. Constitution does? In Free Speech on Campus, Martin P. Golding confronts this question, examining issues of principle in the debate over campus speech. Golding suggests that the University is a special social institution that has as its goal the dissemination and advancement of knowledge, and he explores some of the implications of this approach, including its implication for faculty hiring. Golding examines the claim that there are academic orthodoxies in the University that inhibit the introduction of new ideas and methods, and he critically discusses in detail arguments that have been advanced for campus speech codes. Students and teachers in every discipline will find this book engaging and illuminating; it is especially relevant for ethicists and philosophers of education. |
Vsebina
Campus Speech Issues | 1 |
The Constitution of Learning | 15 |
SPECIALIST FACULTY | 18 |
THE PURSUIT OF KNOWLEDGE | 21 |
IS IT A MYTH? | 25 |
Campus Speech and Unacceptable Ideas | 33 |
EXCLUSION OF IDEAS FROM THE UNIVERSITY? | 36 |
THE ARGUMENT OVER SOCIOBIOLOGY | 37 |
SOME QUESTIONS ON DELGADOS APPROACH | 52 |
THE RACIAL INSULT AS A MESSAGE OF SUBORDINATION | 55 |
THE STANFORD POLICY | 58 |
Campus Speech Restrictions II | 71 |
THE VICTIMS PERSPECTIVE AND HATE SPEECH | 72 |
THE UNIVERSITY AS SAFE HARBOR | 73 |
SANITIZED RACISM AND ANTISEMITISM | 78 |
HOSTILE ENVIRONMENT AND VERBAL HARASSMENT | 83 |
THE ACADEMICIANS DILEMMA | 43 |
Campus Speech Restrictions I | 47 |
PRELIMINARIES ON SPEECH CODES | 48 |
WORDS THAT WOUND | 50 |
INSULT AS ASSAULT | 51 |
John Doe v University of Michigan | 95 |
Speech and Speech Acts | 107 |
| 115 | |
About the Author | |
Druge izdaje - Prikaži vse
Pogosti izrazi in povedi
academic freedom administration advances in knowledge affirmative action Amendment American anti-Semitism argued argument behavior campus speech codes Chaplinsky chapter civil claim classroom conduct constitutional controversial course debate Delgado demeaning demic discipline discrimination discriminatory harassment discussion Duke University educational effect epithets ethnic example fact faculty members falsehoods fighting words free speech free speech provision freedom of expression freedom of speech Graglia hate speech Holocaust denial hostile environment illocutionary act individual inquiry instance institutions Jews Keegstra Lawrence marketplace of ideas ment Michigan offensive opinions political pornography Professor Matsuda prohibit protected question racial insult racist speech regarded regulation sanctionable says sexual harassment sexual orientation slurs social sociobiology speech codes Stanford code Stanford policy statements subordination Supreme Court teaching tenure tion tolerance trade in ideas truth U.S. Constitution unacceptable university's marketplace verbal victims violation women Words That Wound