 The general principle announced in numerous cases is that a right, question or fact distinctly put in issue and directly determined by a court of competent jurisdiction, as a ground of recovery, cannot be disputed in a subsequent suit between, the same...  The Federal Reporter - Stran 111917Celotni ogled - O knjigi
 | 1907 - 1350 strani
...former action adversely to the plaintiff's contention In this ease, and therefore barred a recovery. "A right, question, or fact distinctly put in Issue,...jurisdiction as a ground of recovery, cannot be disputed lu a subsequent suit between the same parties or their privies; and, even if the second suit is for... | |
 | 1909 - 1320 strani
...JUDICATA— MATTEBS IN ISSUE. A matter distinctly put in issue and directly determined by a court o£ competent jurisdiction as a ground of recovery cannot...subsequent suit between the same parties or their privies, even if the second suit is for a different cause of action. [Ed. Note.— For other cases, see Judgment,... | |
 | 1921 - 1204 strani
...disputed In subsequent suit between same parties or their privies. Under the rule of res judicata, a right, question, or fact, distinctly, put in issue...directly determined by a court of competent jurisdiction, cannot be disputed in a subsequent suit between the same parties or their privies, and even if the... | |
 | Arkansas. Supreme Court - 1916 - 638 strani
...by it. So it will be seen that the legality of the organization of McRae Special School District was distinctly put in issue and directly determined by a court of competent jurisdiction in the suit instituted by the Attorney General against the parties claiming to be directors of McEae... | |
 | District of Columbia. Court of Appeals - 1902 - 670 strani
...that the final decree in Equity cause 2373 was res judicata in his favor, erred. The general principle that a right, question, or fact, distinctly put in...directly determined by a court of competent jurisdiction, cannot be disputed in a subsequent suit between the same 'parties or their privies, seems to be well-settled... | |
 | William John Tossell - 1923 - 914 strani
...delicto." In Southern Pacific Ry. v. United States, 168 US 1 [42 L. Ed. 355], Justice Harlan says: "A right, question or fact distinctly put in issue...cannot be disputed in a subsequent suit between the parties or their privies ; and even if the second suit is for a different cause of action the right,... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1898 - 792 strani
...the grounds upon which this salutary rule rests. The general principle announced in numerous cases is that a right, question or fact distinctly put in issue...different cause of action, the right, question or fact SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILR'D v. UNITED STATES. 49 Opinion of the Court. once so determined must, as between... | |
 | 1900 - 842 strani
...the plaintiffs is thus explained by the court: "The general principle announced In numerous cases Is that a right, question, or fact distinctly put in...their privies; and, even If the second suit is for a dlfiferent cause of action, the right, question, or fact once so determined must, as between the same... | |
 | West Virginia. Supreme Court of Appeals - 1902 - 832 strani
...Mr. Justice Harlan, reviewing all the important Federal decisions on the subject, the syllabus reads: "A right, question or fact distinctly put in issue...so determined must, as between the same parties or privies be taken as conclusively established, so long as the judgment in the first suit remains unmodified."... | |
 | 1902 - 828 strani
...announces the general rule, which disposes of every question raised by the defendant here, as follows: "A right, question, or fact distinctly put In issue...directly determined by a court of competent Jurisdiction us a gr und of recovery cannot be disputed in a subsequent suit between the same parties or their privies;... | |
| |
