 The general principle announced in numerous cases is that a right, question or fact distinctly put in issue and directly determined by a court of competent jurisdiction, as a ground of recovery, cannot be disputed in a subsequent suit between, the same...  The Federal Reporter - Stran 111917Celotni ogled - O knjigi
 | Abraham Clark Freeman - 1908 - 1208 strani
...all time, unless reversed or modified, binding on the parties and their privies in estate or in law. A 'right, question or fact' distinctly put in issue...suit between the same parties or their privies, and this even though the second suit is for a different cause of action." Of course, the propositions of... | |
 | United States. Patent Office - 1908 - 810 strani
...the Supreme Court of the United States: The general principle nnnounced In numerous fuses Is that n right, question, or fact distinctly put in issue and...determined by a court of competent jurisdiction, as n ground of recovery, cannot be disputed In u subsequent suit between the same parties or their privies;... | |
 | 1909 - 1410 strani
...Court of Arkansas. July 12, 1909.) 1. JUDGMENT (§ 720*)— RES JUDICATA— MATTERS IN ISSUE. A matter distinctly put in issue and directly determined by...jurisdiction as a ground of recovery cannot be disputed iu a subsequent suit between the same parties or their privies, even if the second suit is for a different... | |
 | Nebraska - 1909 - 1386 strani
...between the same parties and for the same purpose. Parrotte v. Dryden, 73 Neb. 291; 102 NW 610. 167. A right, question, or fact distinctly put in Issue and directly determined by a competent jurisdiction as a ground of recovery cannot be disputed in a subsequent suit without the... | |
 | 1909 - 1318 strani
...Pacific Railway v. US (168 US, 1, Ie 48,) " A right, question, or fact distinctly put in issue and determined by a court of competent jurisdiction as a ground of recovery can not be disputed in a subsequent suit between the same parties or their privies; and even if the... | |
 | Jefferson Hoover Broady, D. A. Haggard, D. Avery Haggard - 1910 - 1240 strani
...litigated In the former action. Battle Creek Valley Bank v. Collins, 3 Unof. 38 (90 NW 921). 658. (1903.) A "right, question or fact" distinctly put In issue...suit between the same parties or their privies, and this even though the second suit is for a different cause of action. State, ex rel. Kennedy, v. Broatch,... | |
 | Abraham Clark Freeman - 1910 - 1292 strani
...133 Am. St. Kep. 1066. MORGAN v. KENDRICK. [91 Ark. 394, 121 SW 278.] JUDGMENT—Conclusiveness.—A right, question or fact, distinctly put in issue and...subsequent suit between the same parties or their privies, even if the second suit is for a different cause of action, so long as the judgment in the first suit... | |
 | United States. Congress. House. Committee on Claims - 1910 - 122 strani
...Pacific Railway v.\j. S. (168 US, 1, 1. c.48), "A right, question, or fact distinctly put in issue and determined by a court of competent jurisdiction as a ground of recovery can not be disputed in a subsequent suit between the same parties or their privies; and even if the... | |
 | District of Columbia. Court of Appeals - 1911 - 702 strani
...that the question involved in the subsequent action was raised and determined in the prior suit. 3. A right, question, or fact distinctly put in issue...directly determined by a court of competent jurisdiction cannot be disputed in a subsequent suit between the same parties or their privies; ev*n if the second... | |
| |
