...decision must have the same faith and credit in all other states that it is entitled to in that state. "A right, question, or fact distinctly put in issue...their privies ; and, even if the second suit is for a differout cause of action, the right, question, or fact once so determined must, as between the same...

...same law remains on the books? These questions are answered by the language of Mr. Justice Harían: "A right, question or fact distinctly put in Issue...of competent jurisdiction, as a ground of recovery, can not be disputed in a subsequent suit between the same parties or their privies; and even If the...

...opinion of this court. The controlling principle laid down in that opinion was that: "A question of fact distinctly put in issue and directly determined...of competent jurisdiction as a ground of recovery or defense cannot be disputed in a subsequent suit between the same parties or their privies. And,...

...issue, and directly determined by a cuurt of competent jurisdiction as a ground of recovery, cnuuut be disputed in a subsequent suit between the same parties or their privies, and this even though the second suit is for a different cause of action." State v. Brontch, 68 Neb. 687,...

...have litigated or directly passed upon in that suit. — Bishop v. Perrin, 4 Ariz. 190, 35 Pat. 1059. A right, question or fact distinctly put in issue...subsequent suit between the same parties, or their privies, though the second suit be for a different cause of action, so long as the judgment in the first suit...

...Court. 237 U. 8. and the objects for which they are established, that a question of fact or of law distinctly put in issue and directly determined by a court of Competent jurisdiction cannot afterwards be disputed between the same parties. Southem Pacific Railroad v. United States,...

...the Court. 237 US and the objects for which they are established, that a question of fact or of law distinctly put in issue and directly determined by a court of competent jurisdiction cannot afterwards be disputed between the same parties. Southern Pacific Railroad v. United States,...

...decided. Nugent v. Mallory, 145 Ky. 824, 141 SW 850. "The general principle announced in numerous cases is that a right, question, or fact distinctly put in...determined by a court of competent jurisdiction as a ground for recovery, can not be disputed in a subsequent suit between the same parties, or their privies;...

...that question was controlling. The court said: "The general principle announced in numerous cases is that a right, question, or fact distinctly put in...different cause of action, the right, question, or fact ouce so determined must, as between the same parties or their privies, be taken as conclusively established,...

...determined against him.— Slater v. Sklrving, 51 Neb. 108, 70 NW 493. Different Cause of Action. Nebraska. A right, question or fact distinctly put in issue...subsequent suit between the same parties or their privies, even though the second suit is for a different cause of action.— Chicago, B. & QR Co. v. Cass County,...