...set forth with particularity the threats upon which the charges in that regard are predicated ; but it is sufficient to charge the offense in the language of the statute.18 But an information charging that the accused did, "by threatening, following, mocking, and...

...informations. They are accorded a sensible treatment more akin to pleadings in magistrate courts. Generally, it is sufficient to charge the offense in the language of the ordinance and with such certainty of time, place and manner as reasonably to notify defendant of the...

...offense may be easily understood by the jury. In the construction of this section we have held that it Is sufficient to charge the offense In the language of the statute when the words of the statute so far particularize the offense that by their use alone the defendant...

...section; and it does not grammatically limit or qualify the other parts of that section. In such case, it is sufficient to charge the offense in the language of the statute. That iection does not require an intent to defraud the buyer to be averred or proved. ID. — RULE...

...that where a statute creates a new offense, unknown to the common law, and describes its constituents, it is sufficient to charge the offense in the language of the statute. 1 Brick. Digest, p. 499, § 734. Also, that the indictment in such cases need not pursue the very words...

..."knowingly," but they are not repugnant. Where the statute defines a crime or misdemeanor in the disjunctive, it is sufficient to charge the offense in the language of the statute, stating it in the conjunctive, unless the words are repugnant, and even if repugnant, or contradictory,...

...the solicitation of orders by mail is an act which comes within the inhibitions of the statute), and it is sufficient to charge the offense in the language of the statute; for it would be a perfect defense to the charge of soliciting and "the defendant would be completely...