 | 1895 - 1070 strani
...an administrator. The case, In truth, was not one within his jurisdiction. It was not one In which he had a right to deliberate. It was not committed to him by law; and, although one of the points occurs in ail cases propor for his tribunal, yet that point cannot... | |
 | Illinois. Supreme Court - 1884 - 804 strani
...one within his jurisdiction. It was not one in which he had a right to deliberate, — it was not one committed to him by the law ; and although one of...all cases proper for his tribunal, yet that point can not bring the subject within his jurisdiction." The general proposition that under our system of... | |
 | Illinois. Supreme Court - 1882 - 786 strani
...of the ordinary) : "The case, in truth, was not one within his jurisdiction. It was not one in which he had a right to deliberate. It was not committed to him by the law." Again, the county court had not acquired jurisdiction of the person for this purpose. It is true a... | |
 | Mississippi. Supreme Court - 1896 - 1256 strani
...of administrator. The case, in truth, was not one within his jurisdiction. It was not one in which he had a right to deliberate. It was not committed to him by law; and, although one of the points occurs in all cases proper for his tribunal, yet that point cannot... | |
 | 1921 - 1098 strani
...an administrator. The case, in truth, was not one within his jurisdiction. It was not one in which he had a right to deliberate. It was not committed...cannot bring the subject within his jurisdiction." Mr. Justice McKee in his concurring opinion in Stevenson v. Superior Court, after making reference... | |
 | 1883 - 536 strani
...the character or powers of an administrator. The case, in truth, was not one within his jurisdiction. It was not committed to him by the law, and although one of the points occur in all cases proper for his tribunal, yet that point cannot bring the subject within his jurisdiction.... | |
| |
Yet the ^decision of the ordinary that the person on whose estate he acts is dead, if the fact be otherwise, does not invest the person he may appoint, with the character or powers of an administrator. The case, in truth, was not one within his jurisdiction.... 
