 | James E. St. Clair, Linda C. Gugin - 2002 - 420 strani
...orderly change. He said, "We reject any principle of governmental helplessness in the face of preparation for revolution, which principle, carried to its logical conclusion, must lead to anarchy" (501). Vinson defended the statute against the defendants' claims that it prohibited even academic... | |
 | John Schrems - 2004 - 408 strani
...To the heart of the difference between peaceful change and the advocacy of violence, the court said: Whatever theoretical merit there may be to the argument...principle of governmental helplessness in the face of preparation for revolution, which principle carried to its logical conclusion, must lead to anarchy.... | |
 | Joseph Francis Menez, John R. Vile - 2004 - 660 strani
...to the government. It was the existence of the highly organized conspiracy that created the danger. "Whatever theoretical merit there may be to the argument...there is a 'right' to rebellion against dictatorial government is without force where the existing structure of the government provides for peaceful and... | |
 | Paul Finkelman - 2006 - 2076 strani
...the US Supreme Court noted: "That it is within the power of the Congress to protect the Government =Dˈ- 9 r N5 ~ 89z8 A Be .... No one could conceive that it is not within the power of Congress to prohibit acts intended to... | |
 | Scott J. Hammond, Kevin R. Hardwick, Howard Leslie Lubert - 2007 - 988 strani
...violence, revolution and terrorism. That it is within the power of the Congress to protect the Government ry campaign; the blood chills and the heart almost...was the attempt to exercise their right to vote. preparation for revolution, which principle, carried to its logical conclusion, must lead to anarchy.... | |
 |
John Massaro - 2008 - 706 strani
...violence, revolution and terrorism. That it is within the power of the Congress to protect the Government of the United States from armed rebellion is a proposition...government provides for peaceful and orderly change. [147: p. 501] But in Silveira v. Lockyer (2003), the dissenting opinion in the Ninth Circuit stated... | |
| |
Whatever theoretical merit there may be to the argument that there is a "right" to rebellion against dictatorial governments is without force where the existing structure of the government provides for peaceful and orderly change. We reject any principle... 
