 Who is the sovereign, de jure or de facto, of a territory is not a judicial, but is a political question, the determination of which by the legislative and executive departments of any government conclusively binds the judges, as well as all other officers,...  Des stipulations et des legs de rentes perpétuelles et viagères ... - Stran 56avtor: Charles-Joseph-Félix Brunet, Charles Brunet - 1890 - 210 straniCelotni ogled - O knjigi
 | United States. Bureau of Insular Affairs, Charles Edward Magoon - 1902 - 822 strani
...Mr. Justice Gray, the law is thus stated: Who is the sovereign de jure or de facto of a territory is not a judicial, but a political, question, the determination of which by the legislative anil executive departments of any government conclusively binds the judges as well as all other officers,... | |
 | United States. Bureau of Insular Affairs, Charles Edward Magoon - 1903 - 808 strani
...Mr. Justice Gray, the law is thus stated: Who is the sovereign dc jure or dc facto of a territory is not a judicial, but a political, question, the determination...been affirmed under a great variety of circumstances. (Gelson r. lloyt, 3 Wheat,, 246, 324; US r. Palmer, 3 Wheat., 610; The Divina Pastora, 4 Wheat., 52;... | |
 | United States. Bureau of Insular Affairs, Charles Edward Magoon - 1903 - 832 strani
...Mr. Justice Gray, the law is thus stated : Who is the sovereign dejure or de facto of a territory is not a judicial, but a political, question, the determination...conclusively binds the judges as well as all other ollicers. citizens, and subjects of that government. This, principle has always been upheld by this... | |
 | Westel Woodbury Willoughby - 1904 - 350 strani
...Islands. . . . Who is the sovereign, de jure or de facto, of a territory is not a judicial, but a pbntical question, the determination of which by the legislative...been affirmed under a great variety of circumstances" (Jones v. United States, 137 US, 202). This case thus not only practically upheld the right of the... | |
 | Westel Woodbury Willoughby - 1904 - 350 strani
...declared, as will be remembered, that "Who is the sovereign, de jure or de facto, of a territory is not a judicial but a political question, the determination...officers, citizens, and subjects of that government" (Jones v. United States, 137 US, 202).! Purposes for which Territory may be Acquired. At the time that... | |
 | United States. Spanish Treaty Claims Commission - 1901 - 796 strani
...Albany 0. Ins. Co., 109 Mass., 24, 31.) Who is the sovereign, de jure or de facto, of a territory is not a judicial but a political question, the determination of which by the legislative and executive departmenta of any government conclusively binds the judges, as well as all other officers, citizens,... | |
 | 1904 - 1354 strani
...territory la not a Judicial one, but a political question, the determination of which by the Legislature and executive departments of any government conclusively binds the Judges as well as other officers, citizens, and subjects of that government." In the present case the court considered... | |
 | John Bassett Moore - 1906 - 1036 strani
...material to the decision actually made. " Who is the sovereign, <le jure or de facto, of a territory is not a judicial but a political question, the determination...been affirmed under a great variety of circumstances. Gelston c. Hoyt, 3 Wheat. 246, 324 ; United States i-. Palmer, 3 Wheat. 610; The Divina Pastora, 4... | |
 | 1918 - 954 strani
...specifically decided that "Who is the sovereign de jure or de facto of a territory is not a judicial but is a political question, the determination of which by...affirmed under a great variety of circumstances." Jones ». United States, 137 US 202, 212. It is also the result of the interpretation by this court... | |
 | 1918 - 962 strani
...specifically decided that "Who is the sovereign de jure or de facto of a territory is not a judicial but is a political question, the determination of which by...affirmed under a great variety of circumstances." Jones v. United States, 137 US 202, 212. It is also the result of the interpretation by this court... | |
| |
