| United States. Congress. House. Committee on the Judiciary - 1963 - 598 strani
...been held to encompass not only conspiracies that might involve loss of government funds, but also "any conspiracy for the purpose of impairing, obstructing...lawful function of any department of Government." Haas v. Henkel, 216 US 462, 479. No argument is made, nor do we think that it could be successfully... | |
| United States. National Commission on Reform of Federal Criminal Laws - 1970 - 796 strani
...United States"] is not confined to fraud as that term has been defined in the common law. It reaches "any conspiracy for the purpose of impairing, obstructing...the lawful function of any department of government . . ." "The classic critique is Goldstein, Conspiracy to Defraud the United States, 68 YALE LJ 405... | |
| Peter Schrag - 1974 - 420 strani
...speculating in grain futures. The statute [said the Court] is broad enough in its terms to include any conspiracy for the purpose of impairing, obstructing...the lawful function of any department of Government . . . Any conspiracy which is calculated to obstruct [the Department's] . . . efficiency and destroy... | |
| United States. Congress. Joint Committee on Congressional Operations - 1976 - 1336 strani
...344 (1906) ; United States v. Brewster, 408 US 501 (1972), and the punishment of conspiracies "for impairing, obstructing or defeating the lawful function of any department of Government," Haas v. Henkel, 216 US 462, 479 (1910). See also In re Coy, 127 US 731 (1888). The legislation here... | |
| United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Government Operations - 1977 - 526 strani
...contemElate a financial loss or that one shall result. The statute is road enough in its terms to include any conspiracy for the purpose of impairing, obstructing,...the lawful function of any department of Government [I] t must follow that any conspiracy which is calculated to obstruct or impair its efficiency and... | |
| 1980 - 532 strani
...been held to encompass not only conspiracies that might involve loss of government funds, but also "any conspiracy for the purpose of impairing, obstructing...lawful function of any department of Government." Haas v. Henkel, 216 US 462, 479. No argument is made, nor do we think that it could be successfully... | |
| |