 | 1920 - 700 strani
...with land bordering along that channel. In an action of ejectment the plaintiff must recover on the strength of his own title and not on the weakness of his adversary's: Hammond v. Shepard, 186 111. 235 ; Phelps v. Nazworthy, 226 111. 254; Terhune v. Porter, 212 111. 595.... | |
 | 1952 - 892 strani
[ Prikaz vsebine te strani ni dovoljen ] | |
 | 1952 - 812 strani
[ Prikaz vsebine te strani ni dovoljen ] | |
 | United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs - 1953 - 1468 strani
...by someone else, it is fundamental that the one challenging the right of possession must rely on the strength of his own title and not on the weakness of his adversary's. So the United States should not he allowed to rely on the weakness of the title of the State of California... | |
 | Illinois. Supreme Court - 1899 - 714 strani
...is a matter of no consequence whether the appellants had any title or not. The plaintiff is bound to recover upon the strength of his own title, and not on the weakness of that of his adversary. (Wliitford v. Drexel, supra). The propositions of law, submitted by the appellants... | |
 | California - 1959 - 1046 strani
[ Prikaz vsebine te strani ni dovoljen ] | |
 | 1954 - 960 strani
[ Prikaz vsebine te strani ni dovoljen ] | |
 | Illinois. Supreme Court - 1904 - 710 strani
...that he was the owner of the property in question. It is well settled that, in an action of replevin, a plaintiff must recover upon the strength of his own title, and, where his title is denied, the burden of proof is upon him to show a general or special property in... | |
| |
The rule that a plaintiff in ejectment must recover upon the strength of his own title and not on the weakness of his adversary's... 
