 the omission to do something which a reasonable man, guided by those considerations which ordinarily regulate the conduct of human affairs, would do, or doing something which a prudent or reasonable man would not do  The Law Quarterly Review - Stran 384uredili: - 1899Celotni ogled - O knjigi
 | 1875 - 830 strani
...approval by the courts, that it " is the omission to do something which a reasonable ma*, guided upon those considerations which ordinarily regulate the...affairs, would do, or doing something which a prudent and reasonable man would not do." Thus it is seen that the concluding words of oar author's elaborate... | |
 | 1875 - 842 strani
...Hence negligence is said to be, the omission to do something which a reasonable man guided upon the considerations which ordinarily regulate the conduct...affairs would do, or doing something which a prudent and reasonable man would not do: Ernst v. ffudson River RR Co., 35 NY 927. More than this ordinary... | |
 | Henry John Wastell Coulson, Urquhart Atwell Forbes - 1880 - 788 strani
...Negligence " Negligence is the omission to do something which a eQ ' " reasonable man, guided upon those considerations which " ordinarily regulate the...which a prudent or reasonable " man would not do." Ignorance of the existence of a cause of mischief has, moreover, been held to be no excuse, •where... | |
 | 1881 - 1014 strani
...conclusion ? Let us go back for a moment to first principles. " Negligence has been defined to be ' the omission to do something which a reasonable man,...affairs, would do, or doing something which a prudent and reasonable man would not do.' 5 It must be determined, in all cases, by reference to the situation... | |
 | Thomas Beven - 1881 - 188 strani
...Negligence," says Alderson, B., (h) " is the omission to do something which a reasonable man, guided upon those considerations which ordinarily regulate the conduct of human affairs, would do, or the doing something which a prudent and reasonable man would not do." In Degg v. Midland Railway Company... | |
 | 1902 - 842 strani
...Alderson, B., said, " Negligence is " the omission to do something which a reasonable man, " guided upon those considerations which ordinarily regulate "the..." which a prudent or reasonable man would not do." The defendants might have been liable for negligence if unintentionally they omitted to do that which... | |
 | 1883 - 908 strani
...11 Exch. 784, " is the omission to do something which a reasonable man, guided upon those ordinary considerations which ordinarily regulate the conduct...affairs would do, or doing something which a prudent and reasonable man would not do. See Railroad Co. v. Jones, 95 US (5 Otto) 430, or, according to the... | |
 | Ontario. High Court of Justice - 1884 - 706 strani
...blunder, and brings the defendants within the well known definition of Alderson,B.: "Negligence is the omission to do something which a reasonable man...affairs would do, or doing something which a prudent and reasonable man would not do:" Blyth v. Birmingham Waterworks Co., 11 Ex. 781. If an individual... | |
 | John Coke Fowler - 1884 - 472 strani
...Company (25 LJ Ex. 213): 'Negligence is the omission to do something which a reasonable man, guided upon those considerations which ordinarily regulate the...affairs, would do, or doing something which a prudent and reasonable man would not do.'" One of the most important cases on the law of negligence is the... | |
 | Herbert Broom, Herbert Francis Manisty, Charles Francis Cagney - 1884 - 1078 strani
...; negligence being defined to be "the omission to do something which a reasonable man, guided upon those considerations which ordinarily regulate the...affairs, would do, or doing something which a prudent and reasonable man would not do " (71) ; negligence, moreover, not being " absolute or intrinsic,"... | |
| |
