 the omission to do something which a reasonable man, guided by those considerations which ordinarily regulate the conduct of human affairs, would do, or doing something which a prudent or reasonable man would not do  The Law Quarterly Review - Stran 384uredili: - 1899Celotni ogled - O knjigi
 | Philadelphia College of Pharmacy. Alumni Association - 1894 - 288 strani
...the old definition: " Negligence is the omission to do something which a reasonable man, guided upon those considerations which ordinarily regulate the conduct of human affairs, would do, or the doing something which a reasonable and prudent man would not do." It is very important to note... | |
 | Abraham Clark Freeman - 1898 - 1022 strani
...prudence, and forethought as under the circumstances duty requires should be given and exercised. It is the omission to do something which a reasonable man,...affairs, would do, or doing something which a prudent and reasonable man would not do: Foxworthy v. Hastings, 23 Neb. 772. As has been repeatedly said, the... | |
 | 1898 - 252 strani
...following well-known definitions, for instance, the element of knowledge is quite latent: Negligence is the omission to do something which a reasonable man,...human affairs, would do, or doing something which a reasonable man would nut do. Alderson, В., in Blyth e. Birmingham Waterworks Co. (1856) 11 Exch. 781,... | |
 | Abraham Clark Freeman - 1899 - 996 strani
...Utah, 189; 62 Am. St. Rep. 916, and note. NEGLIGENCE— LIABILITY FOR—WHEN EXISTS.—Negligence is the omission to do something which a reasonable man. guided by those consideration which ordinarily regulate the conduct of human affairs, would do, or the doing of something... | |
 | Abraham Clark Freeman - 1899 - 1054 strani
...be given and exercised. It is the omission to do something which a reasonable man, guided by tfiose considerations which ordinarily regulate the conduct of human affairs, would do, or the doing of something which a prudent and reasonable man would not do: Brotherton v. Manhattan Beach... | |
 | 1900 - 958 strani
...which are adopted by the courts. The first judicial definition is by Baron Alderson, who describes It as "the omission to do something which a reasonable...human affairs, would do, or doing something which a reasonable and prudent man would not do." Vili, (i, Su. 14 capacity to judge and foresee consequences... | |
 | Niichirō Matsunami - 1900 - 336 strani
...something which a reasonable man would not do. Sometimes it is defined, with more show of accuracy, as the omission to do something which a reasonable...regulate the conduct of human affairs, would do; or, as the omission to do something which a prudent person would ordinarily have done under the circumstances... | |
 | Herbert Broom - 1900 - 888 strani
...(z); negligence being defined to be " the omission to do something which a reasonable man, guided upon those considerations which ordinarily regulate the...affairs, would do, or doing something which a prudent and reasonable man would not do " (a) ; negligence, moreover, not being " absolute or intrinsic," but... | |
 | Idaho - 1901 - 620 strani
...malice or wrong towards the other party.—Benkert v. Renkert, 32 Cal. 470. NEGLIGENCE: Negligence is the omission to do something which a reasonable man....affairs, would do, or doing something which a prudent an-:! reasonable man would not do. It is not absolute or Intrinsic, but always relative to some circumstances... | |
 | John Milton Gardner, Walter James Eagle - 1901 - 800 strani
...Foxworthy v. City of Hastings, 23 Neb. 772, 37 NW Rep. 657, followed: " Another definition is this: " The omission to do something which a reasonable man,...affairs, would do, or doing something which a prudent and reasonable man would not do." Omaha St. R'y Co. v. Craig, 39 Neb. 601, 9 Am. Neg. Cas. 547, 58... | |
| |
