...fourth specified by the statute is that the patentee "was not the original and first inventor [400] or discoverer of any material and substantial part of the thing patented." Rev. Stat. § 4920, amended March 3, 1897, chap. 391, § 2, 29 Stat. at L. 692, Сотр. Slat. §...

...S. Ct 324, 70 L. Ed. 651, available as a defense to show that Putnam was not "the first and original inventor or discoverer of any material and substantial part of the thing patented." This Hawley patent discloses fully the very advantages of a wide, thin, soft tire which are claimed...

...Ct 324, 70 L. Ed. 651, available as a defense to show that Putnam was. not "the first and original inventor or discoverer of any material and substantial part of the thing patented." This Hawley patent discloses fully the very advantages of a wide, thin, soft tire which are claimed...

...involving a part of a patent and it appears that the patentee, in his specifications, claimed to be, but was not, the original and first inventor or discoverer of any material or substantial part of the thing patented, no costs shall be included in such judgment, unless the...

...discovery thereof, or more than 1 -year prior to his jpplication for a patent therefor-; or Fourth. That he was not the original and first inventor or...material and substantial part of the thing patented; or Fifth. That it had been in public use or on sale in the country for more than 1 year before his...

...Invention precluded its use to Invalidate a later patent 51 US at 497-98. Fourth. That [the patentee] was not the original and first inventor or discoverer...material and substantial part of the thing patented : * * * There has long been a distinction in the law between the defense of invalidity based on unpatentability...

...described in some printed publication prior to his supposed invention or discovery thereof; or, I,ourth, that he was not the original and first inventor or...material and substantial part of the thing patented ; or, Fifth, that it had been in public use or on sale in this country for more than two years before...

...The statute gives the list of defenses. Colonel McMtiLLEN. Yes. Mr. REID. The law states : " Fourth. That he was not the original and first inventor or...material and substantial part of the thing patented." Isn't that right ? Colonel McMuLLEN. Yes; that is right. Mr. REID. Would not that be true? Colonel...

...thereof, or more than [two yearsj one year prior to his application for a patent therefor; or, Fourth. That he was not the original and first inventor or...material and substantial part of the thing patented; or, Fifth. That it had been in public use or on sale in this country for more than [two yearsj one...

...the defense, under ES 4920, was that he was not the first inventor. ES 4920, "Fourth" defense, was: "That he was not the original and first inventor or...material and substantial part of the thing patented." This was based on that part of RS 4886 corresponding to present 102 (a), which read, "not known or...