 | Frank Bergen - 1918 - 78 strani
...provision in a bill to provide territorial government for New Mexico which should exclude slavery, he said, "would be idle as it respects any effect it would...ordinance of nature, nor to reenact the will of God. ' ' It has been said that Webster was in error when he declared that nature had barred slavery from... | |
 | Frank Bergen - 1918 - 70 strani
...provision in a bill to provide territorial government for New Mexico which should exclude slavery, he said, "would be idle as it respects any effect it would...ordinance of nature, nor to reenact the will of God. ' ' It has been said that Webster was in error when he declared that nature had barred slavery from... | |
 | William Backus Guitteau - 1919 - 730 strani
...the climate and the soil of the country, had made slavery impossible there. " I would not take pains to reaffirm an ordinance of Nature, nor to reenact the will of God. And I would put in no Wilmot Proviso, for the purpose of a taunt or a reproach." The North, continued... | |
 | Organization of American Historians - 1923 - 862 strani
...it is now generally conceded that there was profound wisdom in the utterance: "I would not take the pains uselessly to reaffirm an ordinance of nature, nor to reenact the will of God. ' ' Of this principle Douglas became the heir and champion. He would remove the question of slavery... | |
 | Elijah Robinson Kennedy - 1924 - 292 strani
...that if a resolution or a bill were now before us to provide a territorial government for New Mexico I would not vote to put any prohibition into it whatever. Such a prohibition would be idle as respects any effect it would have upon the territory; and I would not take pains uselessly to reaffirm... | |
 | David Saville Muzzey - 1922 - 696 strani
...physical geography, which made impossible in them the cultivation of the staple products of the South. He "would not take pains uselessly to reaffirm an ordinance of nature nor to reenact the will of God." He "would put in no Wilmot Proviso for the mere purpose of a taunt or a reproach." The abolitionist... | |
 | David Saville Muzzey - 1927 - 710 strani
...physical geography, which made impossible in them the cultivation of the staple products of the South. He "would not take pains uselessly to reaffirm an ordinance of nature nor to reenact the will of God." He "would put in no Wilmot Proviso for the mere purpose of a taunt or a reproach. " The abolitionist... | |
 | 1928 - 692 strani
...for such a prohibition because it would be useless, not needed, and would affront the southern men. Such a prohibition would be idle, as it respects any...an ordinance of nature, nor to re-enact the will of God.o Had Daniel Webster turned his mind to the discovery of the place where the ordinance of nature... | |
 | Raymond Garfield Gettell - 1928 - 652 strani
...territories. He believed that slavery would not be successful in any case in these areas, and said that he "would not take pains uselessly to reaffirm an ordinance of nature, nor to re-enact the will of God." n Manual of Political Ethics (1838-1839), Legal and Political Hermtncutics (1839), Civil Liberty and... | |
 | Albert Bushnell Hart, John Gould Curtis - 1901 - 758 strani
...territorial government for New Mexico, I would not vote to put any prohibition into it whatever. The use of such a prohibition would be idle, as it respects any...have upon the territory ; and I would not take pains to reaffirm an ordinance of nature, nor to reenact the will of God. And I would put in no Wilmot proviso,... | |
| |
The use of such a prohibition would be idle, as it respects any effect it would have upon the territory ; and I would not take pains to reaffirm an ordinance of nature, nor to re-enact the will of God. 
