 | Morris March Estee - 1886 - 728 strani
...§ 131. Who is Real Party in Interest. — Where codes do not prevail, actions upon contracts must be brought in the name of the party in whom the legal interest is vested, or whose legal interest has been injuriously affected ; and the legal interest was held... | |
 | District of Columbia. Supreme Court (1863-1936), Franklin Hubbell Mackey - 1887 - 640 strani
...names of the new and substituted commissioners? "It is a general rule that an action on a contract must be brought in the name of the party in whom the legal interest in such contract is vested. The legislature alone has power to make an exception to this rule. An exception... | |
 | 1914 - 1412 strani
...which lies at the very foundation of suits at law. That principle is that an action on a contract must be brought in the name of the party in whom the legal interest in the contract is vested. 1 Ch. PI. 3. A party suing, who, by his own showing, by the averments in... | |
 | Illinois. Appellate Court, Edwin Burritt Smith, Martin L. Newell - 1887 - 706 strani
...v. Gipps, 16 111. 352; ICRR Co. v. Allen, 39 111. 205 ; Krenchi v. Dehler, 50 111. 176. A suit may be brought in the name of the party in whom the legal title is, for the use of the holder of an unindorsed note. In case of the death of the payee, the holder... | |
 | Ontario. High Court of Justice - 1887 - 900 strani
...two restrictions: (1) the sanction of the Court must be previously obtained, and (2) the action must be brought in the name of the party in whom the legal right or title to the property to be recovered is vested (6). — p. 1439. This is a case, however,... | |
 | 1887 - 882 strani
...restrictions ; (i) the sanction of the Court must be previously obtained ; and (2) the action must be brought in the name of the party in whom the legal right or title to the property to be recovered is vested. But where by an ex parte order, made in the... | |
 | Abraham Clark Freeman - 1889 - 966 strani
...Code, section 3257, that the action on a contract, whether by parol or under seal or of record, should be brought in the name of the party in whom the legal interest is vested, yet it does not thence follow that he must take the beneficial interest as contradistinguished... | |
 | Floyd Russell Mechem - 1889 - 1086 strani
...the agent alone, and, in accordance with the well settled rule that an action upon a contract is to be brought in the name of the party in whom the legal interest in the contract is vested,1 the right of action may be either in the agent alone,* or it may be subject... | |
 | Virginia. Supreme Court of Appeals - 1889 - 780 strani
...names of the new and substituted commissioners? It is a general rule, that an action on a contract must "be brought in the name of the party in whom the legal interest in such contract is vested. The legislature alone has power to make an exception to this rule. An exception... | |
 | Illinois. Appellate Court, Edwin Burritt Smith, Martin L. Newell - 1889 - 710 strani
...capacity. 2 Williams on Executors, Chap. 2; Newhall v. Turney, 14 1l1. 338. In general, the action must be brought in the name of the party in whom the legal interest is vested by the contract, and when the contract is under seal the action must be in the name of the... | |
| |
In general, the action on a contract, whether express or implied, or whether by parol, or under seal, or of record, must be brought in the name of the party in whom the legal interest in such contract was vested. 
