 The President is to be commanderin-chief of the army and navy of the United States. In this respect his authority would be nominally the same with that of the king of Great Britain, but in substance much inferior to it. It would amount to nothing more...  War Powers: Hearings, Ninety-third Congress, First Session - Stran 67avtor: United States. Congress. House. Committee on Foreign Affairs. Subcommittee on National Security Policy and Scientific Developments - 1972 - 532 straniCelotni ogled - O knjigi
 | John Hart Ely - 1993 - 260 strani
...wrote: The President is to be commander-in chief of the army and navy of the United States. [This] would amount to nothing more than the supreme command...raising and regulating of fleets and armies, — all which, by the Constitution under consideration, would appertain to the legislature. The Federalist,... | |
 | Harry G. Summers - 1995 - 280 strani
...nominally the same with that of the King of Great Britain, but in substance much inferior to it. It would amount to nothing more than the supreme command and direction of the military and the naval forces, as first General and Admiral of the confederacy; while that of the British King extends... | |
 | John Hart Ely - 1993 - 260 strani
...wrote: The President is to be commander-in chief of the army and navy of Ihe United Slates. |This| would amount to nothing more than the supreme command and direction of Ihe military and naval forces, as first general and admiral of (he Confederacy, while that of Ihe British... | |
 | Daniel N. Hoffman - 1997 - 318 strani
...individuals, and it emphasized that in its view no constitutional rights of Americans were at stake. ing more than the supreme command and direction of the...as first general and admiral of the confederacy." 22 As late as 1850, the Supreme Court avowed that "the power of the President. . . was simply that... | |
 | David P. Currie - 1997 - 356 strani
...the Confederacy; while that of the British King extends to the declaring of war and to the raising of fleets and armies; all of which by the Constitution...consideration would appertain to the Legislature"). Sec also 2 Farrand at 318-19; 1 Tucker's Blackstonc at 269-70; 1 Kent at 53; and the views of Washington... | |
 | John P. Kaminski, Richard Leffler - 1998 - 244 strani
...nominally the same with that of the King of Great-Britain, but in substance much inferior to it. It would amount to nothing more than the supreme command...the raising and regulating of fleets and armies; all which by the Constitution under consideration would appertain to the Legislature.1" The Governor of... | |
 | Brien Hallett - 1998 - 212 strani
...be Commander in Chief of the army and navy of the United States. In this respect his authority.. . would amount to nothing more than the supreme command...the raising and regulating of fleets and armies; all which by the Constitution under consideration would appertain to the Legislature. In short, it is the... | |
 | Louis Fisher - 1998 - 332 strani
...reasoned that the president was less threatening than the king of England because the monarchical power "extends to the declaring of war and to the raising and regulating of fleets and armies."132 The American Constitution vests those powers solely in Congress. Madison counseled against... | |
 | Joseph M. Lynch - 2005 - 340 strani
...against the charge that it had been invested with monarchical powers: "[The president's military power] would amount to nothing more than the supreme command...and direction of the military and naval forces,... while that of the British King extends to the declaring of war and to the raising and regulating of... | |
 | Richard J. Ellis - 1999 - 340 strani
...nominally the same with that of the King of Great Britain, but in substance much inferior to it. It would amount to nothing more than the supreme command and direction of the military and naval forces, and first general and admiral of the Confederacy; while that of the British king extends to the declaring... | |
| |
